<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Rearrange Your Package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package</link>
	<description>pink is the new black</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>ohh and yeah I never was a fan of Alien, as jkndrkn said RPM&#039;s are for Red hat systems, installing them on machines that are running Debian, Gentoo Etc can have odd effects.  When there is only and RPM available then I think it is best to compile from source, atleast that way you know that its installing stuff in the correct spots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohh and yeah I never was a fan of Alien, as jkndrkn said RPM&#8217;s are for Red hat systems, installing them on machines that are running Debian, Gentoo Etc can have odd effects.  When there is only and RPM available then I think it is best to compile from source, atleast that way you know that its installing stuff in the correct spots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 05:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-9041</guid>
		<description>I have never been a fan of RPM distros.  Debian was my flavor of choice for a few years until I discovered Gentoo.  Gentoo was bliss in the way it handled things, just took soooo damn long to get X compiled.  Though I guess that was the reason for DistCC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never been a fan of RPM distros.  Debian was my flavor of choice for a few years until I discovered Gentoo.  Gentoo was bliss in the way it handled things, just took soooo damn long to get X compiled.  Though I guess that was the reason for DistCC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BinaryPhalanx</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-9032</link>
		<dc:creator>BinaryPhalanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-9032</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not RPMs themselves are like the Windows registry, it&#039;s the RPM database that tries to act in a similar fashion.

debpackages are nice, as are gentoo portage packages. They just handle things like dependencies a lot better than RPM does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not RPMs themselves are like the Windows registry, it&#8217;s the RPM database that tries to act in a similar fashion.</p>
<p>debpackages are nice, as are gentoo portage packages. They just handle things like dependencies a lot better than RPM does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-9017</link>
		<dc:creator>Nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-9017</guid>
		<description>I usually prefer RPM&#039;s over compiling, simply for the fact of ease.  I don&#039;t think RPM&#039;s are anything like the Windows registry...they are just a method of installing and managing software to be easily removed and upgraded as needed.  One thing I hate about compiling shit is that the &#039;make uninstall&#039; command isn&#039;t always there, and I don&#039;t always remember how or where I installed something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually prefer RPM&#8217;s over compiling, simply for the fact of ease.  I don&#8217;t think RPM&#8217;s are anything like the Windows registry&#8230;they are just a method of installing and managing software to be easily removed and upgraded as needed.  One thing I hate about compiling shit is that the &#8216;make uninstall&#8217; command isn&#8217;t always there, and I don&#8217;t always remember how or where I installed something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BinaryPhalanx</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-9001</link>
		<dc:creator>BinaryPhalanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 07:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-9001</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;d want to install RPM&#039;s, the whole idea of the system is just a lame attempt in bringing Windows&#039; worst feature over to Linux: the registry.

Besides that, RPM-based distros are USUALLY structured in a very similar manner to standard RedHat, because they&#039;re based on redhat (though some variations do occur, and that&#039;s why there are distro-specific RPM&#039;s), and they&#039;re not &quot;put together&quot; the same as a Debian-based, Slackware-based, or Gentoo-based distro.

The reason the packages have to be &#039;rearranged&#039; is twofold: 1, because RPM itself is structured completely differently from a debpkg, genpkg, or tgz, and 2, because the root distros themselves tend to be structured in subtly (and sometimes less-than-subtly) different ways.

@jkndrkn: I&#039;m not sure that timeline is technically correct, as it shows SuSE branching off of Slackware... though SuSE is clearly an RPM-based distro. At least, it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;d want to install RPM&#8217;s, the whole idea of the system is just a lame attempt in bringing Windows&#8217; worst feature over to Linux: the registry.</p>
<p>Besides that, RPM-based distros are USUALLY structured in a very similar manner to standard RedHat, because they&#8217;re based on redhat (though some variations do occur, and that&#8217;s why there are distro-specific RPM&#8217;s), and they&#8217;re not &#8220;put together&#8221; the same as a Debian-based, Slackware-based, or Gentoo-based distro.</p>
<p>The reason the packages have to be &#8216;rearranged&#8217; is twofold: 1, because RPM itself is structured completely differently from a debpkg, genpkg, or tgz, and 2, because the root distros themselves tend to be structured in subtly (and sometimes less-than-subtly) different ways.</p>
<p>@jkndrkn: I&#8217;m not sure that timeline is technically correct, as it shows SuSE branching off of Slackware&#8230; though SuSE is clearly an RPM-based distro. At least, it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nessa</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>Nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>True, but RPM&#039;s (esp. ones labeled as generic) are no longer just targeted to Redhat systems anymore...you can find them for just about any major Linux distribution nowadays...except for Debian it seems like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but RPM&#8217;s (esp. ones labeled as generic) are no longer just targeted to Redhat systems anymore&#8230;you can find them for just about any major Linux distribution nowadays&#8230;except for Debian it seems like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkndrkn</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-8941</link>
		<dc:creator>jkndrkn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-8941</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because RPM stands for &quot;Red Hat Package Manager&quot;. 

A quick look at a Linux Distro Timeline (http://futurist.se/gldt/ldt75.png) shows that Debian and Red Hat form separate major branches. Also, Debian predates Red Hat somewhat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because RPM stands for &#8220;Red Hat Package Manager&#8221;. </p>
<p>A quick look at a Linux Distro Timeline (<a href="http://futurist.se/gldt/ldt75.png" rel="nofollow">http://futurist.se/gldt/ldt75.png</a>) shows that Debian and Red Hat form separate major branches. Also, Debian predates Red Hat somewhat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package/comment-page-1#comment-8933</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.v-nessa.net/2007/12/20/how-to-rearrange-your-package#comment-8933</guid>
		<description>I usually rearrange my package while crossing and uncrossing my legs.....no one ever seems to notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually rearrange my package while crossing and uncrossing my legs&#8230;..no one ever seems to notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
